fbpx

Smarter Path to Clean Energy

Access to a wider range of low- and zero-carbon-emissions fuels is a critical part of the solution

We support the goal of reducing carbon emissions in order to reduce the terrible impact of climate change. To that end, our legislators and the governor need to know that the path we’re traveling is too narrow to give us confidence that we’ll be able to do that.

Electric grid vulnerability is rising nationwide, not just in New York. The U.S. Energy Information Administration recently found that Americans are facing the longest total annual power outages they’ve ever recorded.*

Before Christmas, over 76,000 people around Buffalo lost power in frigid conditions that took the lives of several dozen people. In March, more than 100,000 lost power when the first nor’easter pummeled the region with snow and high winds.

Unfortunately, NY’s climate plans don’t seem to prioritize the reliability of the grid. They prioritize carbon emissions. So they would outlaw the use of Natural Gas and Oil for power production, even though these fuels generate more than half the electricity New Yorkers use in winter, especially on the coldest days. They call for the transition to renewable power at a speed and scale that has rarely, if ever, been seen. And all this is happening at the same time as Nuclear Power plants have been decommissioned, removing them as a power source, and as NY works to rapidly increase electric use in homes, buildings and cars.

Is it any wonder that so many people are concerned about the future reliability of our electric grid in NY?

*Source: https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=50316#

The CLCPA law mandates that 70 percent of New York’s grid electricity come from renewable sources by 2030 and 100 percent by 2040. This will require a massive increase in new renewable power generation at the same time as the state is helping thousands of homes, buildings and cars convert to electricity. Experts have claimed there will be as much as a 10 percent gap in power needed vs. generating capacity if the Climate Action Council plans are followed. That would be a huge problem.

Only about 10 percent of our state’s electricity currently comes from wind and solar. Meanwhile, natural gas and other fossil fuels generate roughly half of our electricity. (More on the coldest days.)

Nuclear power supplies about one-quarter of our electricity. Yet, nuclear power facilities are being decommissioned at an alarming rate. In April 2021, the Indian Point nuclear power plant went offline, taking 40 percent of the state’s nuclear generation with it.

Moreover, solar and wind cannot provide power 24 hours a day, unlike the generation sources they’re supposed to replace. Critical breakthroughs in battery storage technology essential to this plan have not been deployed on the scale that would be required in New York.

*Source: IEA, NY-ISO

[NOTE: Dual Fuel means Gas/Oil, as in systems that can switch from one fuel to the other, depending on which fuel is more readily available.]

Can we really trust this process?

While advocates try to argue that the grid can be made renewable fairly quickly, and have various plans to make it so, they rely on many things going right, and a huge amount of new infrastructure investment that can’t come from Washington alone. And when in your lifetime has anything rushed so fast with so much money at stake ever gone right?

Let Albany know we need a more diverse energy solution

Take Action!

It’s not too late to avoid catastrophe! Speak up NOW and tell the governor and your legislators that you’re concerned they’re moving too far, too fast. All you have to do is click below to let your voice be heard. The Legislature is in Session only until June 6. Please ACT NOW!

Take Action Today!

Missing Out on Diversifying Our Energy Sources

Alternatively, improvements in the renewable content of traditional fossil fuels coupled with increased efficiency of their equipment allow us to reduce carbon output faster and with less extraordinary expense on infrastructure.

It’s time to recognize that trying to be perfect is the enemy of being good. Fuels like Propane Gas, Natural Gas and Heating Oil have an important practical role to play in the decarbonization process.

Propane Gas

  • In comparison to a few other widely used fuels, propane is one of the lowest in carbon emissions per million BTUs.*
  • Propane produces 43% fewer greenhouse gas emissions than using an equivalent amount of electricity generated from the national electric grid.**
  • The U.S. Department of Energy classifies it as a clean alternative fuel.
  • Even electrification advocates admit electrifying everything nationally will take over 20 years and cost about $20-$25 trillion. By replacing heavy carbon engines and appliances, clean and renewable energy like propane can accelerate decarbonization today.

Renewable Propane Gas

While it is not in common use yet, renewable propane gas is positioned to be a major part of the fuel conversation in the coming months and years. Sporting ultra low carbon intensity, it is created in the same process as biodiesel, from animal fats, biomass, plant matter, etc. Because it is molecularly identical to propane gas, the two can be blended together to work in existing systems without huge conversion costs.

Sadly, research and innovation into this sustainable product will not continue if Albany stifles innovation in a rush to electrify everything.

Learn more about propane gas and renewable propane gas today!

  • Natural gas is described by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) as an “efficient, relatively clean burning, and economical energy source.”
  • According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), natural gas offers a flexibility that makes it “a good fit for the rise of variable renewables such as wind and solar [photovoltaics].”
  • In colder climates, natural gas will keep you warmer than electric heat for less money, plain and simple.

Weighing Your Options

The argument for natural gas over electric heat in colder climates has even been covered in popular consumer media, like MarthaStewart.com. In “Gas Versus Electric Heat: Which One is Better for Your Home?” Trane Residential partner and home renovator Anthony Carrino said, “for those living in colder climates that experiences freezing or subfreezing temperatures, a new gas furnace with a higher Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency (AFUE) rating would be recommended.”

  • Right now, Bioheat® fuel — a combination of ultra-low-sulfur heating oil and 100% renewable biodiesel — is mandated in NY State at a 5% blend, also called B5. A 20% biodiesel blend is mandated by 2030. These blends work with existing oilheat systems and avoid the need for very expensive and disruptive conversion to heat pumps. There are even UL-listed burners now that work with 100% biodiesel.
  • B20 Bioheat fuel reduces CO2 emissions by 14.6%. Using B50 Bioheat fuel eliminates 4.29 million metric tons of carbon, reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 36.5%. Learn more about Bioheat’s role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the least costly, least disruptive way.
  • New York City’s municipal buildings used 222.9 million gallons of Bioheat fuel from 2013 to 2020. Over 75% of all heating oil used by NYC municipal buildings is blended with Bioheat fuel.
  • Bioheat fuel is made in the U.S. and doesn’t add additional load to our already fragile electric grid. When you use it to heat your home, you support American farmers, energy producers and sellers.

Learn more about Bioheat fuel at MyBioheat.com.

This is too important to ignore!

Speak up for your energy future and make your voice heard TODAY! The Legislature is in Session only until June 6. Please ACT NOW!

Take Action Today!